Why New Yorkers should vote for a constitutional convention


I’m voting “Sure” on the Nov. 7 poll proposal to carry a state constitutional conference (or con-con) in 2019, and I urge you to take action as nicely.

Showing like a political Brigadoon subsequent month, the query provides New York voters a as soon as-in-a-era alternative to amend the state Structure — which requires that the con-con proposal seem on the poll each 20 years.

Millennials, particularly, shouldn’t miss the prospect to vote in favor of bringing New York’s Structure — final utterly revised in 1894 — into the twenty first century.

Voting “Sure” is a approach to construct a greater mousetrap relating to curbing Albany corruption and dysfunction. (Coincidentally, 1894 was the identical yr that William Hooker acquired a US patent for his mousetrap invention.)

Potential enhancements embrace: reforming the election regulation; attaining nonpartisan redistricting; setting time period limits, and mandating transparency in finances-making.

To not point out prospects like limiting the Legislature’s capacity to impose unfunded mandates on native governments and its infinite “backdoor borrowing” schemes.

And simplifying the byzantine courtroom construction. That alone — as estimated by an Workplace of Courtroom Administration panel means again in 2007 — would save litigants, employers and taxpayers $500 million over 5 years. In the present day, the financial savings would possible be even higher.

If “Sure” wins, it units off a yr of main- and common-election voting to decide on 2014 con-con delegates (three per state Senate district, plus 15 at-giant ones). The conference would then meet on the Capitol in Albany, with the expectation that it will supply amendments (whether or not a collection of choices, or one package deal) for the voters to think about in November 2019.

The final con-con, in 1967, is taken into account a failure as a result of voters rejected its work — an all–or-nothing package deal of reforms. Since then, voters have twice rejected authorizing a conference, in 1977 and 1997.

Nothing scares political insiders and guardians of the established order greater than voters exercising their rights and having a voice in how they’re ruled. Considered one of their massive arguments is that a con-con can be an costly waste of cash.

What? There’s been no higher waste of public cash than the corrupt Buffalo Billion program or tasks just like the one meant to draw Hollywood filmmakers to Syracuse. I might tick off 10 extra with ease.

Others declare there’s no drumbeat for reform. But you possibly can’t go every week with out some…



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *