Vietnam War series on PBS left out vital aspects of the war’s evolution: William…


William Chafe is an emeritus professor of historical past at Duke College 

DURHAM, North Carolina — Ken Burns’ and Lynn Novick’s 18-hour Vietnam Conflict documentary promised completely new revelations about how and why Vietnam turned some of the polarizing experiences in trendy historical past.

With out query, the footage of the conflict inside Vietnam was graphic and sensational.

Watching American troopers danger their lives to save lots of one other wounded GI, experiencing the fear of strolling via a Vietnamese forest into an ambush, seeing a South Vietnamese officer blow away a Viet Cong captive – all of this brings the conflict house in a method we’ll by no means have the ability to overlook. As we comply with particular person veterans and their households, and in addition hear from Vietnamese, South and North, we achieve a profound new understanding of how and why the lives of those that fought in Vietnam have been reworked.

However this was alleged to be research of the entire Vietnam expertise: how did the historical past of this warfare evolve; what have been the pivotal turning factors; why and the way did the nation come aside at house over American coverage in Vietnam.

Vietnam Conflict collection provides lots to study for these of us who weren’t there: Ted Diadiun

On this set of points, the Burns/Novick documentary is much less profitable. It does little to deal with the historical past of the struggle, and fails to probe deeply its important turning factors. We study – briefly – concerning the alliance between Ho Chi Minh and the People towards the top of World Warfare II. However too little consideration is dedicated to how robust the alliance was – for example, there is no point out of U.S. warplanes flying overhead to salute Ho Chi Minh at his presidential inauguration.

Much more necessary, there isn’t a exploration of how and why, three years later, America allied itself with the French of their colonial occupation of Vietnam, or how the Chilly Struggle was pivotal to that shift away from staying allied with the Vietnamese towards colonialism.

If we didn’t have to woo the French into becoming a member of NATO, would we had deserted the Vietnamese? The query isn’t requested.

And although the documentary mentions President John F. Kennedy’s catastrophe with the Bay of Pigs invasion and his horrible assembly with Soviet chief Nikita Khrushchev in Vienna, not sufficient is claimed about how Kennedy’s determination to extend America’s troops in Vietnam was primarily a sign to the united states of our intention to struggle Communist enlargement elsewhere (one other occasion of the Chilly Conflict’s significance). Neither is…



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *